The website doesn't support your browser. Please update your browser or download a different one

90W 6A Turbo Fast Wall Charger for Xiaomi 12 Lite 13T 14 Ultra Redmi Note 11T 12T 13 15Pro POCO F4 X5 USB Type C Charge Cable

Current price
From Price 15.21
VAT included
Matches the image
ColourMatches the image

Size

Delivering across 🇨🇭 Switzerland
6–11 business days · 4.36 € per order
Your payments and privacy are safe
No-delivery refund
Quality guarantee
Secure logistics
Privacy protection

Characteristics

Quick charge
Yes
Number of USB ports
1 port
Adapter type
USB 3.1

Description

Sihuasheng
4.5/5,000+

Reviews 50

4.3
March 28
EU Plug+2M

It's a fake, true power of this charger is only 33 w, don't buy it to avoid wasting of your time. The speed i am experiencing is correct—it is not a 90W charger. Here is the breakdown of why the label doesn't add up: 1. The "Input" Giveaway Look at the line `Input: 100-240V ~ 0.7A`. * An input of **0.7A** is the standard specification for **Xiaomi 33W** chargers (like the MDY-11-EZ). * For comparison, a genuine **90W** charger requires an input of about **2.0A** to pull enough power from the wall. * Mathematically, at the lower end of the voltage (100V), 0.7A can only provide about **70W** of raw power. Since chargers aren't 100% efficient, it's physically impossible for this device to output 90W. 2. Conflicting Output Specs The label lists multiple "Max" wattages, which is a major red flag for counterfeit hardware: * It says `11.0V = 3.0A Max 33.0W Max`. * Directly below that, it claims `20V = 4.5A Max 90.0W Max`. * Authentic chargers from Xiaomi usually only list the maximum capacity of that specific model. Seeing both 33W and 90W listed as "Max" on the same label indicates a fake "one-size-fits-all" sticker used by manufacturers to make cheap 33W chargers look more powerful. 3. Model Number Inconsistency The model **MDY-12-ES** is technically the model number for Xiaomi's **67W** charger. * A real MDY-12-ES would be rated for 67W, not 33W or 90W. * The fact that your charger has this model number but the internal specs of a 33W unit (0.7A input) confirms it is a counterfeit This charger is a **33W unit** disguised with a fake label. It will never reach 90W speeds because the internal components aren't designed to handle that much power.

March 28
EU Plug+2M

It's a fake, true power of this charger is only 33 w, don't buy it to avoid wasting of your time. The speed i am experiencing is correct—it is not a 90W charger. Here is the breakdown of why the label doesn't add up: 1. The "Input" Giveaway Look at the line `Input: 100-240V ~ 0.7A`. * An input of **0.7A** is the standard specification for **Xiaomi 33W** chargers (like the MDY-11-EZ). * For comparison, a genuine **90W** charger requires an input of about **2.0A** to pull enough power from the wall. * Mathematically, at the lower end of the voltage (100V), 0.7A can only provide about **70W** of raw power. Since chargers aren't 100% efficient, it's physically impossible for this device to output 90W. 2. Conflicting Output Specs The label lists multiple "Max" wattages, which is a major red flag for counterfeit hardware: * It says `11.0V = 3.0A Max 33.0W Max`. * Directly below that, it claims `20V = 4.5A Max 90.0W Max`. * Authentic chargers from Xiaomi usually only list the maximum capacity of that specific model. Seeing both 33W and 90W listed as "Max" on the same label indicates a fake "one-size-fits-all" sticker used by manufacturers to make cheap 33W chargers look more powerful. 3. Model Number Inconsistency The model **MDY-12-ES** is technically the model number for Xiaomi's **67W** charger. * A real MDY-12-ES would be rated for 67W, not 33W or 90W. * The fact that your charger has this model number but the internal specs of a 33W unit (0.7A input) confirms it is a counterfeit This charger is a **33W unit** disguised with a fake label. It will never reach 90W speeds because the internal components aren't designed to handle that much power.

September 6, 2025
EU Plug+1M

I need a 90W charger, not a 120W one. The phone for which the charger was bought does not support 120W.

May 15, 2025
EU Plug+1M

Very good. Charge like the original.

April 18
EU Plug+2M

Do not be fooled by the "90W" or "67W" branding on this charger. This is a dangerous counterfeit with falsified technical specifications. Here is the proof: Falsified Labels: The sticker claims "90.0W Max" and "33.0W Max" simultaneously. Physically, it is impossible for a charger to have two different "Maximum" ratings on the same output line. Impossible Input/Output Ratio: The label lists an input of 0.7A. A real 90W or 67W charger requires a much higher input (usually 1.5A - 2.0A). With 0.7A, this unit is internally just a basic 33W adapter at best. Fake Fast-Charge Animation: This is the most deceptive part. The charger is programmed to trick Xiaomi/Redmi phones into displaying the "67W Turbo Charge" animation, but the actual charging speed is much slower. It mimics the digital handshake of an original charger without providing the actual power. Zero Compatibility: While it "tricks" Xiaomi phones, it fails to charge other devices (like Romoss power banks or other brands) properly. It lacks real Power Delivery (PD) or Quick Charge (QC) protocols, charging large devices at a pathetic 5W speed (8% per hour). Don't be fooled by the "90W" or "67W" marking on this charger. It's a dangerous counterfeit with falsified technical specifications. Here's the proof: False marking. The sticker simultaneously indicates "90.0W Max" and "33.0W Max". It is physically impossible for a charger to have two different "maximum" power values on the same output line.. Impossible ratio of input and output power. The specifications indicate an input current of 0.7A. A real 67W or 90W charger requires a much higher input current (usually 1.5A – 2.0A). At 0.7A, this device is internally a standard 33-watt adapter at best.. Fake fast charging animation. This is the most insidious part. The charger is programmed to trick Xiaomi/Redmi phones into displaying the "67W Turbo Charge" animation, even though the actual charging speed is much lower. It simulates the "digital handshake" of the original device without delivering the actual power.. Zero compatibility. Although it "deceives" Xiaomi smartphones, it is incapable of properly charging other devices (e.g., Romoss power banks or gadgets from other brands). It lacks true Power Delivery (PD) or Quick Charge (QC) protocols, causing large devices to charge at a negligible power of 5W (about 8% per hour).

November 14, 2025
EU Plug+2M

Ninety watts, they said... Fast charging... Lies!!! There's not only no fast charging, but even regular charging barely works... The size and weight seem to match, but it just doesn't work and that's it...

February 15
EU Plug+1.5M

The first day of charging, it would turn off by itself, then turn back on. I was already thinking of writing a complaint. But from the second day, everything started working normally. I've already done three full phone charges and everything is fine so far.

November 17, 2025
EU Plug+1M

The charger and its cable are excellent, show 90W, support fast charging, indistinguishable from the original. I am very satisfied, thank you very much 🙏

October 29, 2025
EU Plug+1.5M
March 20
EU Plug+1M
July 28, 2025
EU Plug+1M

The charger and cable are excellent, they support fast charging, and show a power of 90 W. I am very satisfied, thank you very much 🙏

March 25
EU Plug+2M
March 17
EU Plug+1M
July 22, 2025
EU Plug+1.5M
December 20, 2025
EU Plug+1.5M

Shows 120w, stamping, does not meet the requirements.

April 12
EU Plug+1M
May 28, 2025
EU Plug+1.5M

The charger does not charge the phone

November 29, 2025
EU Plug+1M

Works 90w gives out

October 21, 2025
EU Plug+2M

Generally 120 W

June 17, 2025
EU Plug+1.5M

Satisfied

Similar products